Old Hong Kong-5 — Page 255

Old Hong Kong 昔日香港 All AI Reviewed

254

COURTS 21 Continuation.

admitted to practise as a Proctor, Attorney and Solicitor in the Supreme Court of Hongkong on November 2, 1846) and was himself admitted to similarly practise on January 22, 1869.

Mr. Francis used to say that every morning (or shall I say on most mornings?) at about 11 a.m. Mr. Gaskell used to vanish for about half an hour for the purpose of paying a visit to the Old Hongkong Club, which was situated hard by, and that frequently before his departure, he would strictly enjoin upon Mr. Francis the necessity for the latter to refrain from leaving the office, lest thereby business might be lost - adding, "If you catch 'em and I'll skin 'em!"

In those days, according to the later Mr. Henry Lardner Dennys, the four leading solicitors (taking the order according to the respective dates of their local admission to practise) were Gaskell, Hazeland, Sharp, and Caldwell. Of these, Francis Innes Hazeland (admitted to practise on February 17, 1858) was Crown Solicitor, Edmund Sharp (admitted to practise on June 23, 1863) was the progenitor of the well-known firm of Johnson, Stokes and Master (formerly Sharp, Toller and Johnson and subsequently Sharp, Johnson and Stokes), while Henry Charles Caldwell (admitted to practise on November 30, 1865) after being articled to Messrs. Cooper-Turner and Hazeland, joined Mr. Roger Carmichael Robert Owen who had succeeded to the practice of Dr. William Thomas Bridges (admitted to practise on April 15, 1851) - the firm eventually being known as Caldwell and Brereton, and later Brereton, Wotton and Deacon (now Deacons), of whom Mr. Brereton was admitted to practise on February 8, 1870, Mr. Wotton on November 8, 1871, and Mr. Victor Hobart Deacon on July 12, 1880.

While Mr. Francis was still practising as a solicitor, he was joined by the late Mr. Matthew John Denman Stephens (admitted in England on November 25, 1863, and locally on January 31, 1873), who was formerly with Messrs. Rooks, Kenrick and Hartson of King Street, Cheapside, London.

Mr. Francis' name as an attorney was taken off the roll at his own request on December 29, 1873, and he was subsequently called to the Bar as a member of Gray's Inn, London, being admitted to practise at the Bar of the Supreme Court of Hongkong on March 16, 1877, at which date the leader of the Hongkong Bar (that is, apart from the Attorney-General who, by reason of his office, takes precedence of all members of the Bar) was Mr. Thomas Child Hayllar, who had been called by the Inner Temple, London, on June 6, 1861, and admitted to practise in Hongkong on January 29, 1868. Upon Mr. Hayllar's retirement, somewhere about the year 1883, Mr. Francis became the leader of the Hongkong Bar - a position which he maintained until his death in Japan in or about August 1901, when he was succeeded in his leadership by the late Mr. Ernest Hamilton Sharp, K.C. (who had been called by the Inner Temple on April 1894), who on his death in or about February 1922, was succeeded as leader by Mr. Eldon Potter, K.C.

Mr. Francis was, as various articles on "Old Hongkong" have shown, a strong character. He was a sound lawyer, though not so erudite as the late Mr. Sharp. He was an able cross-examiner and, as is the case with most Irishmen, of very ready speech and wit. A favourite expression of his when engaged in cross-examination was "Do not prevaricate or beat about the bush, but answer me truly, yes or no." Another expression in which he, on occasion, indulged in answer to the Court as to whether his arguments were addressed to, say, head (a) or head (b) was "Neither the one, nor the other, my Lord."

Page 255
Page 256

Edit History

2026-05-02 13:29:18 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
254 COURTS 21 Continuation. admitted to practise as a Proctor, Attorney and Solicitor in the Supreme Court of Hongkong on November 2, 1846) and was himself admitted to similarly practise on January 22, 1869. Mr. Francis used to say that every morning (or shall I say on most mornings?) at about 11 a.m. Mr. Gaskell used to vanish for about half an hour for the purpose of paying a visit to the Old Hongkong Club, which was situated hard by, and that frequently before his departure, he would strictly enjoin upon Mr. Francis the necessity for the latter to refrain from leaving the office, lest thereby business might be lost - adding, "If you catch 'em and I'll skin 'em!" In those days, according to the later Mr. Henry Lardner Dennys, the four leading solicitors (taking the order according to the respective dates of their local admission to practise) were Gaskell, Hazeland, Sharp, and Caldwell. Of these, Francis Innes Hazeland (admitted to practise on February 17, 1858) was Crown Solicitor, Edmund Sharp (admitted to practise on June 23, 1863) was the progenitor of the well-known firm of Johnson, Stokes and Master (formerly Sharp, Toller and Johnson and subsequently Sharp, Johnson and Stokes), while Henry Charles Caldwell (admitted to practise on November 30, 1865) after being articled to Messrs. Cooper-Turner and Hazeland, joined Mr. Roger Carmichael Robert Owen who had succeeded to the practice of Dr. William Thomas Bridges (admitted to practise on April 15, 1851) - the firm eventually being known as Caldwell and Brereton, and later Brereton, Wotton and Deacon (now Deacons), of whom Mr. Brereton was admitted to practise on February 8, 1870, Mr. Wotton on November 8, 1871, and Mr. Victor Hobart Deacon on July 12, 1880. While Mr. Francis was still practising as a solicitor, he was joined by the late Mr. Matthew John Denman Stephens (admitted in England on November 25, 1863, and locally on January 31, 1873), who was formerly with Messrs. Rooks, Kenrick and Hartson of King Street, Cheapside, London. Mr. Francis' name as an attorney was taken off the roll at his own request on December 29, 1873, and he was subsequently called to the Bar as a member of Gray's Inn, London, being admitted to practise at the Bar of the Supreme Court of Hongkong on March 16, 1877, at which date the leader of the Hongkong Bar (that is, apart from the Attorney-General who, by reason of his office, takes precedence of all members of the Bar) was Mr. Thomas Child Hayllar, who had been called by the Inner Temple, London, on June 6, 1861, and admitted to practise in Hongkong on January 29, 1868. Upon Mr. Hayllar's retirement, somewhere about the year 1883, Mr. Francis became the leader of the Hongkong Bar - a position which he maintained until his death in Japan in or about August 1901, when he was succeeded in his leadership by the late Mr. Ernest Hamilton Sharp, K.C. (who had been called by the Inner Temple on April 1894), who on his death in or about February 1922, was succeeded as leader by Mr. Eldon Potter, K.C. Mr. Francis was, as various articles on "Old Hongkong" have shown, a strong character. He was a sound lawyer, though not so erudite as the late Mr. Sharp. He was an able cross-examiner and, as is the case with most Irishmen, of very ready speech and wit. A favourite expression of his when engaged in cross-examination was "Do not prevaricate or beat about the bush, but answer me truly, yes or no." Another expression in which he, on occasion, indulged in answer to the Court as to whether his arguments were addressed to, say, head (a) or head (b) was "Neither the one, nor the other, my Lord." Page 255Page 256
Baseline (Original)
254 COURTS 21 Continuation. admitted to practise as a Proctor, Attorney and Solicitor in the Supreme Court of Hongkong on November 2. 1846 ) and was himself admitted to similarly practise on January 22, 1869. Mr. Francis used to say that every morning (or shall I say on most morning :) at about 11 a.m. Mr. Gaskell used to vanish for about half an hour for the purpose of paying a visit to the Old Hongkong Club, which was situated hard by, and that frequently before his departure, he would strictly enjoin upon Mr. Francis the necessity for the latter to refrain from leeving the office, lest thereby business might be lost - adding, it You catch 'em and I'll skin 'em! # In those days according to the later Mr. Henry Lardner Dennys the four leading solicitors ( taking the order according to the respective dates of their local admission to practise } were Gaskell, Hazeland Sharp and Caldwell, Of these, Francis Innes Hazeland (admitted to practise on June February 17, 1858 ) was Crown Solicitor, Edmund Sharp ( admitted to practise on June 23, 1863) was, the progenitor of the well-known firm of Johnson, Stokes and Master formerly Sharp, Toller and Johnson ani sub- sequently Sharp, Johnson and Stokes ) while Henry Charles Caldwell ( admitted to practise on November 30, 1865) after being articled o Messrs. Cooper-Turner and Hazeland, joined Mr. Roger Carmichael bert Owen who had succeeded to the practice of Dr. William Thomas idges ( admitted to practise on April 15, 1851 ) - the rm event- 11 being known as Caldwell and Brereton, and later Bre et on, otton and Deacon ( now Deacons of whom Mr. Brereton wa: wimitted o practise on February 8, 1870, Mr. Wotton on November 8, 1871, and Mr. Victor Hobart Deacon On July 12, 1880. While Mr. Francis was still practising as a solicitor, he was joined by the late Mr. Matthew John Denman Stephens ( admitted in England on November 25, 1863 and locally on January 31, 1873 ) who was formerly with Messrs. Rooks, Kenrick and Hartson of King Street, Cheapside, London. Mr. Francis' name as an attorney was taken off the roll at is own request on December 29, 1873, and he was subsequently cal- ed to the Bar as a member of Gray's Inn, London being admitted o practise at the Bar of the Supreme Court of Hongkong on March 16, 2877, at which date the leader of the Hongkong Bar ( that is apart from the Attorney-General who, by reason of his office, takes precedence of all members of the Bar) was fir. Thomas Dhild Hayllar who had been called by the Inner Temple, London on June 6, 1861, and admitted to practise in Hongkong on January 29, 1868, Upon Mr. Hayllar's retirement, somewhere about the year of 1883, Mr. Francis became the leader of the Hongkong Bar - a position which he main- ined until his death in Japan in or about August 1901, when he 3 succeeded in his leadership by the late Mr. Ernest Hamilton tarp K.O. ( who had bear called by the Inner Temple on april 1894) who on his death in or about February 1922, was succeeded leader by Mr. Eldon Potter K.C. * Mr. Francis was at the various articles on "Old Hongkong " ..ve shown a strong character. He was a sound lawyer, though not so erudite as the e Mr. Sharpt. He was an able cross- examiner and as is the case with most Irishmen of very ready speech and wit. A favourite expression of his when agaged in cross-examination was " do Not prevaricate or beat about the ush, but answer me truly yes or no'. Another express where- in he, on occasion, indulged in answer to the Court as to whether is arugments were addressed to say, head ( a ) or head ( b ) ...$ "Neether the woon, nor the oother my Lurd", Page 255Page 256
2026-05-02 13:29:18 · Baseline
View content

254

COURTS 21 Continuation.

admitted to practise as a Proctor, Attorney and Solicitor in the Supreme Court of Hongkong on November 2. 1846 ) and was himself admitted to similarly practise on January 22, 1869.

Mr. Francis used to say that every morning (or shall I say on most morning :) at about 11 a.m. Mr. Gaskell used to vanish for about half an hour for the purpose of paying a visit to the Old Hongkong Club, which was situated hard by, and that frequently before his departure, he would strictly enjoin upon Mr. Francis the necessity for the latter to refrain from leeving the office, lest thereby business might be lost - adding,

it You catch 'em and I'll skin 'em! #

In those days according to the later Mr. Henry Lardner Dennys the four leading solicitors ( taking the order according to the respective dates of their local admission to practise } were Gaskell, Hazeland Sharp and Caldwell, Of these, Francis Innes Hazeland (admitted to practise on June February 17, 1858 ) was Crown Solicitor, Edmund Sharp ( admitted to practise on June 23, 1863) was, the progenitor of the well-known firm of Johnson, Stokes and Master 【 formerly Sharp, Toller and Johnson ani sub- sequently Sharp, Johnson and Stokes ) while Henry Charles Caldwell ( admitted to practise on November 30, 1865) after being articled

o Messrs. Cooper-Turner and Hazeland, joined Mr. Roger Carmichael

bert Owen who had succeeded to the practice of Dr. William Thomas idges ( admitted to practise on April 15, 1851 ) - the rm event- 11 being known as Caldwell and Brereton, and later Bre et on, otton and Deacon ( now Deacons 】 of whom Mr. Brereton wa: wimitted o practise on February 8, 1870, Mr. Wotton on November 8, 1871, and Mr. Victor Hobart Deacon On July 12, 1880.

While Mr. Francis was still practising as a solicitor, he was joined by the late Mr. Matthew John Denman Stephens ( admitted in England on November 25, 1863 and locally on January 31, 1873 ) who was formerly with Messrs. Rooks, Kenrick and Hartson of King Street, Cheapside, London.

Mr. Francis' name as an attorney was taken off the roll at is own request on December 29, 1873, and he was subsequently cal- ed to the Bar as a member of Gray's Inn, London being admitted o practise at the Bar of the Supreme Court of Hongkong on March 16, 2877, at which date the leader of the Hongkong Bar ( that is apart from the Attorney-General who, by reason of his office, takes precedence of all members of the Bar) was fir. Thomas Dhild Hayllar who had been called by the Inner Temple, London on June 6, 1861, and admitted to practise in Hongkong on January 29, 1868, Upon Mr. Hayllar's retirement, somewhere about the year of 1883, Mr. Francis became the leader of the Hongkong Bar - a position which he main-

ined until his death in Japan in or about August 1901, when he 3 succeeded in his leadership by the late Mr. Ernest Hamilton tarp K.O. ( who had bear called by the Inner Temple on april

1894) who on his death in or about February 1922, was succeeded leader by Mr. Eldon Potter K.C.

*

Mr. Francis was at the various articles on "Old Hongkong " ..ve shown a strong character. He was a sound lawyer, though not so erudite as the e Mr. Sharpt. He was an able cross- examiner and as is the case with most Irishmen of very ready speech and wit. A favourite expression of his when agaged in cross-examination was " do Not prevaricate or beat about the

ush, but answer me truly yes or no'. Another express where- in he, on occasion, indulged in answer to the Court as to whether

is arugments were addressed to say, head ( a ) or head ( b ) ...$ "Neether the woon, nor the oother my Lurd",

Page 255Page 256

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.